friesel writ:
7/9 - XVI.
SCIENCE
@ opening epigraph - Einstein on science’s frailty
so much is inked out
SIDE NOTE:
- why does Zampanò Truant (Danielewski?) “ink out” so much of this chapter?
- & then why leave any clues at all?
- more on “authorial authority” – @todo - speculate ?
-
significance of orphaned footnotes? (& Truant’s ink accident? [the only tattooing he’ll ever do?])
-
impossibly old samples (older than the Earth? older than the Solar System?)